Thursday, April 19, 2012
Rhetoric on The Republic of the Mind
My friend, Jeff Baxter, or JB for short, has posted some comments on my recent posting of an excerpt of Lynn Harold Hough’s thoughts on freedom and intelligence which I titled Republic of the Mind.
John – great piece! I only wish it were true!
While we are in agreement that the Hough excerpt I quoted is a great piece, I must point out that I did not state the excerpt was true, but rather is an exquistely beautiful example of an individual utilizing their mind freely, which I think is one of the most important lessons individuals need understand.
So why aren’t the thoughts expressed by Hough true according to JB?
In short, we cannot grasp true freedom, either in this life, or in our minds. We are forever reaching for the shadows of freedom, imagining at times we have actually grasped it, but it has always, always, always proven to be a false, misleading dream. We have never known true freedom because we do not have full and complete and TRUE peace with God.
JB’s reasoning is echoed by another mutual friend with whom I’ve had a bit of correspondence in the past, Fr. Patrick Fodor, and JB shares Fr. Fodor’s thoughts in his post.
Both JB and Fr. Fodor approach Hough’s thinking as individuals of faith in God, as I am and do, and I fully appreciate their contribution. But I approach this particular thinking of Hough’s without reference to Luther, Calvin, or any other individual’s specific doctrine. In other words, I am approaching Hough’s thinking in freedom.
Both JB and Fr. Fodor are correct, I think, when they state that we cannot grasp true freedom in this life; history rather sharply chronicles this truth, the unattainability of perfection in man as we know him; but the obstacles which they note require surmounting, at least if you’re an individual with faith in God, have been undermined by Christ, and quite possibly we’re not taking full advantage of this.
I’ll close this with a thought of Thomas Jefferson, which is contained in a letter written to Richard Rush in 1813.
...on the subject of religion, a subject on which I have ever been most scrupulously reserved. I have considered it as a matter between every man and his maker in which no other, and far less the public had a right to intermeddle.
That is freedom of the mind and intelligence in action from a member of the republic of the mind.