Two from The Technoptimist
I hadn’t been stopping by Duncan Frissell’s blog, The Technoptimist, on a regular basis for some time. Fortunately, I stopped by again today. Two short posts caught my eye today.
First, this post, which I repost in its entirety.
"Should you answer when Cops ask?
Here is a canned answer you can give when questioned by cops or anyone in (government) authority:
“Sorry, I’d like to help but if I answer you I could later be found liable for obstruction of justice whereas if I say nothing, I avoid all possible liability for obstruction of justice. I, therefore, choose to say nothing.""
Second, a comment from this post, where Duncan points us to a Jonah Goldberg piece on "The Homosexual Question." Duncan’s comment after reading Jonah’s piece.
"It must take a truly bizarre and twisted soul to actively seek out interaction of some kind with a coercive bureaucracy. There are many worse things than neglect."
“Sorry, I’d like to help but if I answer you I could later be found liable for obstruction of justice whereas if I say nothing, I avoid all possible liability for obstruction of justice. I, therefore, choose to say nothing.”
Smart-mouthing cops is probably not a good idea. Acting stupid and ignorant is safer. ‘Plausible deniablility’ is the watchphrase, here.
Posted by on 01/15 at 07:49 PMI daresay, given years’ reading of his work, that Duncan has different priorities and watchphrases than most people.
Posted by damaged justice on 01/15 at 08:02 PM"Smart-mouthing cops is probably not a good idea. Acting stupid and ignorant is safer. ‘Plausible deniablility’ is the watchphrase, here."
John, excellent point. In my experiences to date with the police state, I have donned my sheep clothing, yet the wolf within me is prepared to strike.
Posted by on 01/16 at 08:25 AMIan, enjoyed the link you provided.
Posted by on 01/16 at 08:27 AM
Next entry: "May I Kill It?"
Previous entry: Another Billion Dollar Boondoggle
