Spelunking for Popularity
The other day I criticized a Nicholas Kristof piece which commented on the 9/11 commission. Kristof’s piece was titled “Why Didn’t We Stop 9/11?” Within that post, I linked to a Billy Beck post which was related to the subject matter Kristof was wondering about. Also, in the comments section, a commentator, Robert, left a link to another opinion on this subject.
Today, stopping by The American Spectator, I find another interesting piece written by Geoffrey Norman. Norman’s piece is titled “Surprised Again” and within his piece Norman has the following to say, among other things.
“Taken together, the 9/11 hearings and the 2004 presidential campaign are an almost lethally demoralizing combination. William Faulkner famously said (or wrote) that the past is not really dead; it is not even past. Well, he was a smart man but even he probably couldn’t have anticipated the way we have gone spelunking down the memory hole these last few weeks, mining for votes. First, Bush/Kerry rekindled the debate over Vietnam. Then, the hearings turned into the kind of “it wasn’t my fault; it was all your fault” sort of exercise that obscures the past in the smog of partisanship when what most people outside of Washington would settle for is a little more clarity.
With this crew and these hearings—fat chance. When it is not about votes; it is about book sales and television ratings. Will the hearings produce any new information or insights or—perish—the kind of wisdom it will take to prevent a future 9/11?”
Once again, government fails us. Why do we persist with the notion that it has ANY useful qualities?
-sed
Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 04/19 at 09:36 AM
Next entry: It's Everbodies Fault Except the Drunk's
Previous entry: Pile 'Em On
