On Evolutionary Findings

The study of evolution consumes many individuals’ time and thoughts.  The evidence in support of Darwin’s theory, depending upon whom you speak with, is either rock solid, or rudimentary at best.  I don’t think the supporting evidence discovered, so far, has definitively provided the answer to the theory’s validity.  I agree with the following statement, uttered by one Fred Spoor, regarding a recently discovered fossil skull, and its place in the evolutionary debate.

"Spoor notes that the paucity of the fossil record means that many conjectures about Homo erectus remain unproven."

“Petite skull reopens human ancestry debate."

Also via Drudge.

Posted by on 07/02 at 02:27 AM

  1. And Spoor doesn’t note the other problem with the field: http://www.mcremo.com/ - the ‘Forbidden Archelogy’.

    Posted by  on  07/02  at  07:25 AM

  2. Robert - Michael Cremo has stopped by and dropped a note here previously.

    Posted by  on  07/02  at  11:06 AM

  3. Went to folowup on your info with your site search using his name as search terms and I got 28 listings:
    http://www.improvedclinch.com/search/index.php

    Any chance you could narrow that down a bit for me ?

    Posted by  on  07/02  at  01:05 PM

  4. Robert - I’ve hunted around a bit, with no success, so far.  I’ll keep looking.

    Posted by  on  07/04  at  11:19 AM

  5. The only “problems” evolution have are the irrationality of the domestic Taliban, and the fact that government shouldn’t be in the schooling business.

    http://www.vuletic.com/hume/cefec/index.html

    Posted by  on  07/06  at  01:54 PM

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


Next entry: Village Idiots

Previous entry: So, Will They Call Bill Cosby Uncle Tom?

<< Back to main