Monday, December 22, 2003
Non-Local Reality
The issues of science and God are of great interest to me. I don’t find them incompatible, unless individuals utilize either one to coerce, or, to dodge personal responsibility. With that in mind, here’s a link to an article written by Dr . Lee E. Warren, B.A., D.D. entitled “The Power Latent in Man - HAS SCIENCE FOUND GOD IN NON-LOCAL REALITY?" The article looks at quantum mechanics, the Bell Theorem and the EPR paradox and states its intent as,
"This article will compare the invisible, non-local order of our reality identified by quantum mechanics (specifically proven by the Bell Theorem) and Spirit that is invisible, omnipresent, and all in all. We are most familiar with a reality consisting of local events within space and time and one that exists and operates in a chronological framework. Quantum mechanics proves that there is a non-local part of our existence just as real as thoughts, feelings, and ideas that cannot be measured on an instrument. The invisible DNA instructions that directs our cells prove the unseen presence of the Creator in which we live, move, and have our being (Acts 17:22-28)."
Interesting read with many references for further reading.
Via J. Orlin Grabbe.
"Deliberation Day?"
Also from Arts & Letters Daily, is this article proposing a national Deliberation Day. The proposal,
"Registered voters would be called together in neighborhood meeting places, in small groups of 15 and larger groups of 500, to discuss the central issues raised by the campaign. Each deliberator would be paid $150 for the day’s work of citizenship. To allow the business of the world to carry on and as many as possible to participate, the holiday would be a two-day affair."
Right. Richard Posner, writing for the same issue of Legal Affairs disagrees.
What we really need is a personal responsibility day. Actually we need this 365 days a year.
"Death Sentence, The Decay of Public Language"
Author Don Watson has a new book out, the title used as the title for this post, wherein Watson "defends a language he says is being mangled by the globalising forces of obfuscation." From the review of Watson’s book,
"The book charts how “managerial language” has infiltrated the English of politics, business, bureaucracy, education and the arts. The book is about the rise of core strategies and key performance indicators, and the death of clarity and irony and funny old things called verbs. It is about a new language that Watson calls sludge and clag and gruel. Those three blunt words speak to the book’s larger intention. Death Sentence is also a manifesto, the first shots, Watson hopes, in a campaign everyone can join to bring the language back to life."
Here’s the link to the rest of the review.
Sunday, December 21, 2003
A Sunday Afternoon Read
Though in the post immediately below this I have a jab a Richard Dawkins, this article, written by Jack Hardy, entitled "Memetics How Mind Viruses Influence Our Choices and the Way We Think," explores Dawkins idea of memes, which he published in the book "The Selfish Gene." Hardy believes memes have been regarded "too narrowly."
Via J. Orlin Grabbe.
Still Missing the Main Point
Interesting piece written by Edward Rothstein in the New York Times. The piece is entitled “Reason and Faith; Eternally Bound." I, personally, have no argument with Rothstein’s title, and the piece itself, though shallow in thought provoking argument, is an interesting read, considering he quotes Dawkins, whose drum banging to create a new label for atheists, is mere juvenile clique formation. Still, the main point is missed.
The main point to be considered is not that faith is bad, nor reason, but that using either faith, or reason, to coerce individuals to conform to perceived moral standards or behaviors is wrong.
Read the Book
Joshua Zader, who blogs at Mudita Journal, notes and provides a link to an interview with screenwriter James Hart. Hart is evidently working on a new screenplay for "Atlas Shrugged." I’ve never viewed any of Rand’s work that has been turned into a film, and I am somewhat hesitant to do so, based on the visualizations created in my mind, as I read Rand’s books. I think it may be possible for a good screenplay to be written and then produced as a film, but I do not think justice could be done to "Atlas Shrugged" in a film format. Many individuals do not want to think that hard. But that’s just my opinion.
Hart did make one very accurate statement in the linked interview,
"We’re on the threshold of what Ayn Rand predicted,” he noted. “Socialism has crept into everything and we’re penalizing the thinkers, the movers and shakers for being successful. In a way, the world that Ayn Rand created in Atlas Shrugged *is* the United States today."
Can't Find Honest Work
I noticed the article yesterday about Gary Condit suing three tabloids for, as the suit says,
"The stories published in The National Enquirer, The Globe and The Star portrayed Condit as a “murderer” and “sexual deviant” and “caused him to be exposed to public hatred, contempt and ridicule ... for things that never happened,” according to the suit filed in Palm Beach, Fla."
Poor Condit, he just can’t seem to line his pockets with any honestly earned dollars. Although Condit did honestly earn the public’s hatred, contempt and ridicule, for dissing his wife in favor of the young Levy.
Via Drudge.
Update: I couldn’t recall where I had read the quote below when I posted this earlier this morning, but, because I think it is appropriate, I add it now. The quote, from the tome "Plutarch’s Lives," is spoken by Aemilius Paulus to Perseus.
"Why, unhappy man, do you thus take pains to exonerate fortune of your heaviest charge against her, by conduct that will make it seem that you are not unjustly in calamity, and that it is not your present condition, but your former happiness, that was more than your deserts?"
Saturday, December 20, 2003
NYT Editorial Making Sense
A couple of days ago, in a post I titled “What if I’m Wearing It?," I commented on France’s Chirac beating the drums to eliminate individuals’ rights to wear clothing that is in keeping with their religious beliefs. This morning I find this NYT editorial that actually takes Chirac to task for this nonsense. The key sentence,
"Banning believers from following the discipline of their religions would amount to imposing the view of the state upon them."
As long as believers’ disciplines do not impinge on my rights, or yours, no harm, no foul.
Friday, December 19, 2003
$$$ Boondoggle $$$
"Among taxpayers, though, it was the price tag inspired that the most awe. The project cost was more than double the Panama Canal’s in today’s dollars. Citizens here and nationwide - 60 percent of the tab was federal - wound up paying far more than expected. Revelations about hidden cost overruns angered many, as statewide highway tolls climbed. The Massachusetts Turnpike Authority is planning a $150 million lawsuit against firms that managed the project."
I guess the lawsuit is supposed to act like a rebate.
From an article on “Boston’s Big Dig."
Via Drudge.
Looks Like I Won't Have to Be Concerned with Being Selected as a Juror
Radley Balko provides some links to the latest “nannyisms.” I was interested in the article entitled “Trial Lawyers Question Jurors’ ‘Strong Religious Beliefs’." Reading the article, you’ll find that not only are they warning the moneygrubbers about individuals with strong religious beliefs but about individuals with "extreme attitudes about personal responsibility." They even have a term for this, "personal responsibility bias." Look for a law to corral this bias soon.
Here’s what happens if you accept personal responsibility and believe others should, if you are selected for a jury pool.
Identified Problems, Wrong Solution
The Washington Times, in an op-ed written by Deborah Simmons, once again reminds us of the failure of public education, with an emphasis on D.C. public schools. The standard litany of failures are displayed within the op-ed, poor student academic scores, ineffective budget management, nothing new. The solution presented, as usual also, is to put control of the schools, and authority, in the mayor’s hands and, magically, things will become, gradually, otay.
The real solution is to put control of the schools back into individuals hands. The parents of the children who attend. Government does not belong in the schools. Parents do.
If Only My Telescope Were This Powerful
I own a small telescope, it’s optics are better than Galileo’s but are no match for the Hubble or the new Spitzer Space Telescope. The photo that accompanies this article is sweet.
Thursday, December 18, 2003
Make Believe
There is an article in tonight’s Grand Rapids Press entitled "Solid proof of crimes by Saddam hard to find." Unfortunately, no link is available. The article is written by one Farah Stockman, who evidently works for The Boston Globe, as that is the byline, and I cannot find a link for the story there either.
Let me provide you with a few quotes.
A sub-headline,
"The former Iraqi president’s “deity like status” probably protected him from records of his regime’s abuses."
From the article,
Despite the fact thta Saddam’s regime meticuously documented its own abuses, Saddam was more prone to issue broad pronouncements than specific orders,..."
"But the lack of documents specifically linking Saddam to the crimes will make it more difficult for prosecutors to hold him personally responsible for the regime’s atrocities,..."
Screw Saddam Hussein and the fucking horse he rode in on. Take him out in the woods and shoot like the dog he is. Bastard.
As for people who spew crap like that quoted above, it’s time for you to grow up. This isn’t make believe.
Not the article I want, but it’ll have to do for now. Posted by John Venlet on 12/18 at 07:16 PM
(0) Comments •
(0) Trackbacks •
Permalink
A Perverse Winter Pleasure
Yesterday I had to fire up the old shovel. First time this season. Although we had received accumulating snowfall prior to this, mother nature had done my work for me. But yesterday, with temperatures cold enough for the snow to stick around, I did some shoveling. Twice as a matter of fact. And I enjoyed every minute of it.
I can’t say I’ve always had this attitude. At the age of six, when my Dad first placed a shovel in my hands and said “I want to be able to see the curbs,” I didn’t think much of shoveling snow. Especially after, I thought, I had completed shoveling the driveway and gotten my keister back in the house. Invariably, my Dad would poke his head round the basement stairs and say, “I can’t see the curb.” So back outside I’d go and toil some more. This went on until my folks changed the locks on the doors as a way of letting me know that my shenanigans weren’t going to be tolerated any longer in their home.
After, I like to say, moved out, on my own, I didn’t bother much with shoveling. I’d just run whatever winter beater vehicle I was driving through any snow that had accumulated. If the snow was especially deep, I’d have to make a couple of passes in order to pack it down to a navigable surface. By the end of winter, the drive would be packed like a glacier, and you wouldn’t see the curbs til late Spring.
Later, after joining the Navy, I didn’t have to do much shoveling for five years. Being stationed in Hawaii had some distinct advantages, even beyond not having to shovel snow. But after I got out and returned to Michigan, shoveling needed to be done once again. The funny thing was, I ended up shoveling like my Dad always wanted me to when I was a kid. I always wanted to see the curb.
Now, twenty plus years after getting out of the service, shoveling every winter, I take a perverse pleasure in wielding my shovel. The scrape of the blade on cement, the piles of snow growing each time I shovel and the cold air making my nose run. It’s quite satisfying.
People always ask me why I don’t get a snowblower. I guess it’s because I can’t stand the sound of them, or, because I just enjoy shoveling. It’s kind of mindless work, but with verifiable results. Besides, a snowblower just doesn’t clean the snow from the curb real well, and the exhaust doesn’t go well with a cigar.
A Home for Plagiarists
Does the New York Times run ads for journalists that state one of the requirements for being hired is an ability to falsely claim others work as your own, or, lacking that ability, to conjure quotes? Nicholas Provenzo, at The Rule of Reason, looks at Michele Malkin’s story on this entitled “Another Jayson Blair."
